-- MarkusMerschmeyer - 04 Oct 2005

S279 Invariant Mass dependence on B-Field

The Problem

During the first scans of the Jcl203l generation of the S279 data it became obvious that the invariant masses of $ \Lambda $ and $ K^0_S $ were too low (CalibrationStatusS279). To investigate this, I did a scan of runs 6900 to 7099 increasing the field by 0.0%, 1.0%, 1.5% and 2.5%, respectively (0.600 T, 0.606 T, 0.609 T and 0.612 T). The results are given below:

Data Scans with different B-Fields

  • Increasing the field brings up the invariant masses. The respective mean values are indicated by the dashed lines. The nominal masses of $ \Lambda $ and $ K^0_S $ are 1.115683 GeV/c$^2$ and 0.497672 GeV/c$^2$, respectively. Click here for a larger image:

Mean Invariant Mass as Function of B-Field

  • While the mean $ K^0_S $ mass is still too low at a 2.0% larger B-field, the mean $ \Lambda $ mass is already good at a field increased by 1.0 to 1.5%. So, even if there are deviations of the B-field (between different beam times) causing lower or higher invariant masses, they can not be the only effect at work. Click here for a larger image:
Topic attachments
I Attachment Action Size Date Who Comment
zmf_mass_all.gifgif zmf_mass_all.gif manage 53.0 K 2005-10-04 - 11:50 MarkusMerschmeyer xxx
zmf_mdep_all.gifgif zmf_mdep_all.gif manage 24.5 K 2005-10-04 - 11:50 MarkusMerschmeyer yyy
Topic revision: r3 - 2005-11-23, MarkusMerschmeyer
 
This site is powered by FoswikiCopyright © by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding GSI Wiki? Send feedback
Imprint (in German)
Privacy Policy (in German)